A new form of rating the Expanded Personal Services Survey (EPAQ) was applied to assess the constructs from positive and negative androgyny. The EPAQ are given to 196 adult men and women; its answers have been classified on the a differentiated androgyny. Extreme differences was in fact received ranging from negative and positive androgynous some body since better because ranging from negative and positive female and positive and negative male someone towards the a collection of actions out of emotional health insurance and well-are. This type of conclusions contain the legitimacy and you may electricity off differentiating androgyny into the negative and positive types of sex character identity.
References
Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self-confidence once the a purpose of manliness both in men and women. Log out of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 783-785.
Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, Grams., Thompson, Letter. (1981). An Australian Sex Character Measure. Australian Journal out of Therapy, 33, 169-183.
Baril, Grams., Elbert, Letter., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, Grams. (1989). Are androgynous managers very far better? Classification and you can Organisation Training, 14, 234-249.
Bem, S. (1977). On power from alternative tips on the determining from mental androgyny, Journal from Consulting and you may Scientific Psychology, forty-five, 196-203.
Boswell, H. (1997). The latest transgender paradigm shift into totally free term. Within the B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Intercourse merging (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Cheng, C. (1999). Intercourse part variations in awareness on the determine out-of assistance supply toward anxiety. Diary regarding Character, 67, 439-467.
Fey, W. (1955). Welcome by the anyone else and its own relation to desired of self and you can others: A revaluation. Journal out of Unusual and you can Societal Therapy, 50, 274-276.
Eco-friendly, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). The fresh new beauty of gender types of qualities at the other dating accounts: Androgynous characteristics may be prominent whatsoever. Record regarding Character and you can Public Psychology, 20, 244-253.
Heilbrun, An effective. (1981a). Intercourse differences in the functional linkage anywhere between androgyny, public cognition, and you may proficiency. Log regarding Identity and you can Social Therapy, 41, 1106-1118.
Helmreich, Roentgen., Stapp, J. (1974). Quick form of the latest Colorado Social Behavior Catalog, an objective way of measuring notice-esteem. Bulletin of your Psychometric People, cuatro, 473-475.
Hoffman, R. (2001). The new measurement off manliness and femininity: Historical position and implications to possess therapy. Log away from Counselling and you will Advancement, 79, 472-485.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, Roentgen. (1990). Brand new identification and you may interpretation regarding communications outcomes ranging from continuous details from inside the multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Look, twenty-five, 467-478.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, M., Hansson, Roentgen. (1978). The fresh enigma away from androgyny: Differential implications for men and you may females. Record off Contacting and you may Scientific Mindset, 46, 298-313.
Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). The new preparations to have intercourse jobs and you will androgyny: A significant review. Log out of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, forty-five, 1101-1115.
Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Gender jobs and decision-making in the demographically diverse teams: A situation getting reviving androgyny. Gender Spots, 34, 49-663.
Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The experience and you may term from fury. Matchmaking that have intercourse role socializing, despair and you may mental health operating. Record from Consulting Therapy, 43, 58-165.
Lenney, Elizabeth. (1991). Intercourse spots: This new dimensions from maleness, womanliness, and you can androgyny. For the J. Robinson, D. Shaver, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Strategies out of identification and you can personal psychological attitudes (pp. 573-660). North park, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An effective., Butcher, J. (1981). The partnership anywhere between androgyny and you will personal indicators out-of emotional really-becoming. Journal away from Character and you can Personal Mindset, 40, 722-730.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A good., Butcher, J. (1983). Masculinity, womanliness and you may androgyny viewed and reviewed since type of maxims. Journal of Identity and Personal Mindset, 49, 428-439.
s, C. (1989). Androgyny and its own reference to teenage mental well-being: A look at the fresh books. Gender Jobs, 21, 25-341.
Will get, A good., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and dealing for the people having a managerial orientation. South African Journal regarding Psychology, 27, 244-249.
Mead, B., Ignico, A beneficial. (1992). Kid’s intercourse blogged thinking off physical activity: Effects and ramifications. Perceptual and you can Motor Enjoy, 75, 1035-1013.
Nowicki, S., Duke., Meters. (1981). The new Nowicki-Strickland Expected life Locus from Manage Bills: Build validation. Inside H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Browse with the locus out-of control build (Vol. 2, pp. 16-43). New chatango quizzes york: Educational Force.
O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and you will low-stereotypic sex part feature and you may conclusion orientations, intercourse title and emotional variations. Record out of Identity and you may Public Psychology, 58, 134-143.
Pearson, J., Chefs, L. (1995). Sex and you can stamina. Inside the P. M. Kalbfleisch Yards. J. Cody (Eds.), Intercourse, power, and communications within the individual relationships (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robinson, J., Shaver, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Methods out of identity and you can societal psychological thinking. Hillcrest, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Flower, A great., Montemayor, R. (1994). The partnership ranging from gender part positioning and understood thinking-competency in the female and male teenagers. Gender Roles, 29, 579-595.
Russell, G., Antill, J. (1984). An Australian gender-part measure: Even more psychometric investigation and correlations having mind-esteem. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.
Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, Meters. (1991). Hostility, sex character tips and you can Kohut’s psychology of the worry about. Intercourse Opportunities, twenty-five, 41-161.
Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Interpersonal phenomenology since the a purpose of sexual orientation, intercourse, sentiment, and trait classes inside the lasting dyadic relationships. Record off Character and you will Public Therapy, 47, 983-1002.
Get solitary article
Razor, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, Meters., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you can connection safety: A few related type optimal identification. Personality and you can Social Mindset Bulletin, twenty-two, 582-597.
Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and you may successful version over the life span certainly Japanese people. Journal off Genetic Mindset, 158, 389-401.
Skoe, Elizabeth. (1995). Sex role direction and its own relationship to the development of name and you may ethical thought. Scandinavian Log from Therapy, thirty-six, 235-245.
Spence, J. (1984). Manliness, womanliness, and intercourse-associated attributes: An abstract investigation and critique regarding current research. Improvements when you look at the Experimental Personality Look, thirteen, 1-97.
Spence, J. (1999). 3 decades out-of intercourse look: An individual chronicle. For the W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and you can stereotypes within the society: Brand new gender technology out-of erican Mental Connection.
Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Important and you can expressive characteristics, characteristic stereotypes, and you may sexist thinking: Exactly what do they denote? Therapy of women Every quarter, 24, 44-62.
Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Holahan, C. (1979). Bad and the good areas of psychological masculinity and you will womanliness in addition to their relationship to notice-records from neurotic and you will acting-out routines. Diary from Character and Social Therapy, 37, 1673-1682.
Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Stapp, J. (1974). The non-public Qualities Survey: A way of measuring sex character stereotypes and masculinity-womanliness. JSAS Catalog of Chosen Data files in the Mindset, cuatro, 43-49.
Risk, J. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and you can instrumentality from inside the real-world settings: A special position on the benefits of androgyny. Intercourse Spots, 37, 541-564.
Taylor, Meters., Hallway, J. (1982). Mental androgyny: An evaluation and reformulation of ideas, methods, and you will findings. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347-366.
Western, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Creating intercourse. Into the M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered people viewer (pp. 131-149). New york: Oxford College or university Push.
Whitley, B. (1983). Gender part positioning and you can care about-esteem: A life threatening meta-analytic feedback, Diary away from Character and you will Social Mindset, forty two, 765-778.
Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (when you look at the push). Popular and you will unwanted androgyny: A prescription to your twenty-very first 100 years. Journal from Intercourse Degree.
Wulff, M., Steitz, J. (1999). A course model of the relationship ranging from community indecision, androgyny, self-effectiveness and you may mind-value. Perceptual and System Experiences, 88, 935-940.