Participants shown the extent to which the new justification looked beyond the latest excuse-giver’s private handle on good eight-part scale (anywhere between step 1, definitely not so you’re able to eight, much).
Volume off excuses
Our design allowed participants to reflect on both a money and time excuse (N = 64, % of the sample), only a money excuse (N = 15, % of the sample), or only a time excuse (N = 30, % of the sample. money = 2.87, SD = 2.16; Mtime = 3.14, SD = 2.22, t(131) = 1.20, p = .23, d = .10); attesting to the fact that these excuses may be similarly common.
Perceived closeness
To increase our statistical power, we focused our analysis on participants who reflected on both a money and a time excuse. We conducted a repeated-measures ANOVA using perceived closeness (before vs. after) as a within-subjects factor for both money and time excuses. There was a significant main effect for perceived closeness, F(1, 63) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .23; which was qualified by a significant interaction, F(1, 63) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .30 (see Figure 3). Planned contrasts indicated that prior to receiving an excuse, participants felt equally close to their guests (Mmoney = 4.56, SD = 1.61; Mtime = 4.88, SD = 1.54, F(1, 63) = 2.08, p = .16, ? 2 = .03), but after the excuse was provided, participants felt significantly closer to guests who cited financial versus time scarcity (Mmoney = 4.41, SD = 1.76; Mtime = 3.62, SD = 1.69, F(1, 63) = , p = .001, ? 2 = .17).
Thought of controllability
Participants perceived a money excuse to be significantly more outside of the excuse-giver’s personal control than a time excuse (Mmoney = 4.98, SD = 1.75; Mtime = 4.31, SD = 2.01, t(63) = 2.30, p = .02, d = .58).
Identified sincerity
Participants perceived greater trustworthiness from a money excuse than a time excuse (Mmoney = 5.08, SD = 1.76; Mtime = 4.50, SD = 1.84, t(63) = 2.49, p = .01, d = .62).
Mediation
I examined whether higher relative amounts of closeness out-of a loans reason (versus. a time reason) are serially mediated from the sensed controllability, ultimately causing increased thinking out of honesty. To check getting serial mediation, we used MEMORE (Montoya & Hayes, 2017 ), following design 2. The outcome demonstrate that attitudes out of controllability and you can trustworthiness manage serially mediate the relationship between communicating a monetary excuse and better cousin levels of intimacy (95% CI, .00 in order to .18; Get a hold of Appendix S1, Dining table S2).
Conversation
Professionals who obtained each other a period and you will a money justification thought just as alongside its guests ahead of finding brand new excuse. But not, than those who obtained free By ethnicity dating websites a time justification responding in order to the matrimony invite, players thought somewhat closer to the matchmaking lovers shortly after researching a good money reason. The real difference in seen closeness took place due to the fact money reasons were detected because the quicker manageable, and as a result, much more reliable.
You to definitely difference between the outcomes from the research and therefore out-of Research 1A would be the fact i failed to observe a serious fall off within the detected closeness just after finding a financing excuse. It could be that a loans excuse is particularly proficient at reaction to a wedding invitation. While Degree 1A and 1B bring initial help for our theoretical design, the fresh new remember characteristics ones studies have biased our show, such that users may have recalled reasons that were such as for instance discouraging. After that, the fresh pre/blog post dimensions your closeness measure may have authored a request effect. For this reason, about knowledge you to pursue, we establish deeper experimental handle by asking professionals to evaluate vignettes where we controlled precisely the investment referenced regarding the reason and you can counted thinking out-of controllability, faith, and intimacy responding to this correspondence.